Prince Harry has lost his legal battle against the UK government regarding his security arrangements.
The High Court ruled that the decision to downgrade his security status after stepping back from royal duties was lawful and rational.
Harry’s challenge stemmed from being informed that he wouldn’t receive the same publicly-funded protection while in the UK.
The court upheld the government’s stance, stating that his security should be determined case by case.
The Duke’s lawyers argued that the decision-making process was unfair, but the court disagreed, finding no unlawfulness in the decision.
They emphasized that Harry would still have publicly-funded police security but tailored to him, unlike the automatic security provided to full-time working royals.
The ruling might affect Harry’s future visits to the UK, as he expressed difficulty bringing his family due to reduced security.
Despite his appeal plans, the court maintained that the security decision was legally sound.
The court also clarified the process for security under the Royal and VIP Executive Committee (Ravec), rejecting Harry’s interpretation. It stated that he should not expect the same security arrangements as before.
Harry’s spokesperson expressed disappointment, stating their hope for justice in the Court of Appeal.
The Duke, currently residing in the US with his family, has had brief visits to the UK recently, possibly influenced by strained family relations.
The Home Office, pleased with the court’s decision, emphasized the integrity and confidentiality of protective security arrangements. They stated their policy of not divulging detailed information for security reasons.